TFG Red Mist

Status
Not open for further replies.

midgetchris

Team Trinders 08
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
219
what side of the fence are you on?

i personaly use this line and think its brill and was amazed at how unseeable it is in about a foot of water
 

carpy sy

Bivvy Boy ,Beds.
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
980
Never used this line myself,as i'm totally confident in the line i currently use,Berkley Carp Triline.
 

Don

Regular member
Joined
Aug 22, 2003
Messages
3,545
The science says it works and its supposed to be almost invisible to the fish which makes me ask why have I had bites on red maggots all these years lol!
 

vwt4

Regular member
Joined
Sep 29, 2006
Messages
763
Matt hayes did an article this week in AT and was saying he was using this red mist line, because of the unseeable qualities it possesed, then in the next paragraph of the same article he said he was using a carpet of red maggots because they were the best visable bait for tench, I think he was after, and I wondered what the hell is this contradiction,if they cant see the line how can they see the maggots,or come to that, red sweetcorn, or boilies,red lures, red flags for pike fishing,red coloured ground bait etc...They have me beat on this one.
 

Thom

Regular member
Joined
Jan 23, 2006
Messages
6,515
in muddy water i dont see how colour can come through and believe the smell is much mnore importnat in bait. therefore it may be invisible.
 

darrengeorge

speci-ish
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
2,474
Not 100% though chris, otherwise we wouldnt be able to sit it at all.

Light is refracted by all line to a certain degree, so does it really matter what colour it is? I believe it does and prefer to go for a line that matches up with as many different backgrounds as possible, and for me thats a grey colour. Definately not red.

They say that red is the first colour to turn grey at depth, but then, why not just use grey in the first place?
 

Hatman

Drawbag ace
Joined
Apr 17, 2007
Messages
6,200
The science that I've found on this marketing claim isn't sound IMHO. Red may not be very visible to fish, or may become invisible at distance, but does the fish see nothing or is it supposed to see straight through a red object? My take on this is that red may not appear to be red to fish, but that this probable fact is irrelevant since a red line is probably replaced by a dark line. Translucent is as close as we can get to invisible, it doesn't matter if a fish or a human is looking. Thin clear line will remain my preference, and if someone wants to make it harder for a fish to see then matching the refractive index of water would be a good start.

This reminds me of Maxima Chameleon being advertised as being invisible because it absorbs all visible wavelengths (colours = wavelengths) of light. Complete tosh, black is what we call something that absorbs all wavelengths & when did you last think a black car (or anything else) was invisible?
 

strat2

Regular member
Joined
Oct 17, 2006
Messages
1,711
well it find it a gimmick tbh

but the army use a red lense on their lights so that enemys cannot see there lights.

the red has a different wave length and transmits it slower i think.

like the sun is in a yello phase but will soon become a red giant and become invisible. this is over great distances thou line ..... nah not for me
 

Benji

Account Locked
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
1
Originally posted by strat2
but the army use a red lense on their lights so that enemys cannot see there lights.

So why are brake lights visible?

The red light is used as it is easier for human eyes to readjust to low level light situations, well this is what I was told.
 

strat2

Regular member
Joined
Oct 17, 2006
Messages
1,711
nah i mean you no throught there night vision goggle things

im usless at this.. oh well was a guess.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top