CarpCatcher86
Regular member
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2018
- Messages
- 1,513
I am looking at Getting a bike again after not riding for a while. so far I have had the Honda CBR600RR and the CBR1000RR in mind. both bikes are 2007 ish and round about the £3000 mark
after checking go compare (to start with) for insurance quotes, the cheapest quote I got for the 600 was £556.62, for the 1000 the cheapest quote was £1267.50.
why such a huge leap in price? the CBR1000RR is 2.5 inches longer, 31 pounds heavier, is 0.2 seconds faster 0-60 and 0-100 and has a 15mph ish higher top speed than the 600. is that really worth double and a bit extra insurance? I tried adding a few advanced qualifications and being part of a group such as the Honda owners club, just to see if that would make any difference to the price and would actually make advanced riding courses worth it. the price stayed the same on both bikes right down to the last penny.
the only difference I noticed was after one slight modification. I selected 2006 as the year of manufacture and 998cc as the engine size, then in a drop down menu I selected honda cbr 1000 rr fireblade, 2003-2006, 998cc, manual, petrol, sports. the quote was £1267.50. next time I selected 2006 as the year of manufacture and 998cc as the engine size. in the drop down menu I selected honda fireblade, 2006 onward, 998cc, manual, petrol, super sports. the quote dropped to £983.17.
I was advised to go for a slightly older and cheaper bike to keep insurance down, or at least save a little. but I was shocked to find that a 2003-2006 1000cc bike would cost £1267.50 to insure, and a similar value 1000cc bike from 2006 onward would cost £983.17 to insure. so a newer bike for the same price as a slightly older one is cheaper to insure? anyone have any idea why?
surprisingly the same didn't apply to the 600, I selected a slightly younger bike for the same price and the insurance quote stayed the same. the only thing that made the 600 quote go up was when I selected what I didn't know to be one of the limited edition models. of course better or more no claims bonus will also bring insurance down, but it's only been a few months since I passed my full bike test, so I know that will count against me despite being a sort of sensible 32 year old instead of a suicidal 17 year old.
I am so confused right now, but I don't want to call these companies and waste time on the phone as I haven't even made my mind up on the bike or bought one yet. I have found this before with comparison websites, they were designed so people could look for home car bike and pet insurance, and get quotes from all major insurance companies just by entering their details once. in most cases so people like me can check roughly how much insurance will be for a chosen bike or car before they actually buy the bike or car. but all that happens (it hasn't yet this time, fingers crossed) is you get the quotes from the top companies or the cheapest quotes and then those companies call you none stop about your recent enquiry. in reality that's all it was to start with. I just want to check how much insurance will cost me for my chosen vehicle, when I want to start my insurance with your company then you will be the second to know.
the company I passed my test with three months ago were based at an industrial unit a 10 minute walk from my house, they have since moved to somewhere near sheffield so I can't just pop in for a chat.
Has anyone got any advice on how I can get cheaper insurance, or should I say, insure a bike without being hung out to dry as it were? also can anyone explain the fluctuation in the price of insurance I have previously explained?
after checking go compare (to start with) for insurance quotes, the cheapest quote I got for the 600 was £556.62, for the 1000 the cheapest quote was £1267.50.
why such a huge leap in price? the CBR1000RR is 2.5 inches longer, 31 pounds heavier, is 0.2 seconds faster 0-60 and 0-100 and has a 15mph ish higher top speed than the 600. is that really worth double and a bit extra insurance? I tried adding a few advanced qualifications and being part of a group such as the Honda owners club, just to see if that would make any difference to the price and would actually make advanced riding courses worth it. the price stayed the same on both bikes right down to the last penny.
the only difference I noticed was after one slight modification. I selected 2006 as the year of manufacture and 998cc as the engine size, then in a drop down menu I selected honda cbr 1000 rr fireblade, 2003-2006, 998cc, manual, petrol, sports. the quote was £1267.50. next time I selected 2006 as the year of manufacture and 998cc as the engine size. in the drop down menu I selected honda fireblade, 2006 onward, 998cc, manual, petrol, super sports. the quote dropped to £983.17.
I was advised to go for a slightly older and cheaper bike to keep insurance down, or at least save a little. but I was shocked to find that a 2003-2006 1000cc bike would cost £1267.50 to insure, and a similar value 1000cc bike from 2006 onward would cost £983.17 to insure. so a newer bike for the same price as a slightly older one is cheaper to insure? anyone have any idea why?
surprisingly the same didn't apply to the 600, I selected a slightly younger bike for the same price and the insurance quote stayed the same. the only thing that made the 600 quote go up was when I selected what I didn't know to be one of the limited edition models. of course better or more no claims bonus will also bring insurance down, but it's only been a few months since I passed my full bike test, so I know that will count against me despite being a sort of sensible 32 year old instead of a suicidal 17 year old.
I am so confused right now, but I don't want to call these companies and waste time on the phone as I haven't even made my mind up on the bike or bought one yet. I have found this before with comparison websites, they were designed so people could look for home car bike and pet insurance, and get quotes from all major insurance companies just by entering their details once. in most cases so people like me can check roughly how much insurance will be for a chosen bike or car before they actually buy the bike or car. but all that happens (it hasn't yet this time, fingers crossed) is you get the quotes from the top companies or the cheapest quotes and then those companies call you none stop about your recent enquiry. in reality that's all it was to start with. I just want to check how much insurance will cost me for my chosen vehicle, when I want to start my insurance with your company then you will be the second to know.
the company I passed my test with three months ago were based at an industrial unit a 10 minute walk from my house, they have since moved to somewhere near sheffield so I can't just pop in for a chat.
Has anyone got any advice on how I can get cheaper insurance, or should I say, insure a bike without being hung out to dry as it were? also can anyone explain the fluctuation in the price of insurance I have previously explained?