Angling Trust Division 2 National – statement and apology from Steve Fitzpatrick, Head of Competitions

Angling Trust

RSS Feed
Joined
Sep 5, 2020
Messages
483
Following a disappointing delivery of the Division 2 National Championships on the Warwickshire Avon at the weekend I wish to publicly apologise for the errors surrounding the event.

This match did not reach the standard I, or our competitors, expect and I wholeheartedly apologise for any distress caused to anyone affected by the mistakes made.

An admin issue was spotted on the eve of the match which meant our usual, tried-and-trusted draw and resulting software and organisational procedures were unable to be used and so a new system was implemented at short notice.

While not perfect, it did allow the event to continue. However, further human errors on recording and inputting of results, in respect to matching anglers to teams and how points were calculated, were also found. As soon as we were aware of these, we contacted captains of the affected teams to apologise and explain.

We did not set out to spoil the experience of fishing a National and will be learning from the mistakes made. Our Nationals aren’t an automated process, there are human beings at every step of the way.

Our staff work incredibly hard to deliver the breadth and volume of events, they don’t make mistakes intentionally but clearly, we are accountable to our members and where a serious error is made, we will investigate and take appropriate action.

Throughout November and December, I will be running a series of consultations with key stakeholders, anglers, and grass roots supporters of our events to help us shape our competitions for 2023 and beyond.

This is only my first few months in the role, and it is clear the core competitions team of five staff ALONE isn’t enough to deliver the volume of events we organise and run each year – over 250 competitions – as well as management of over 40 international Team England squads. A recruitment process has been ongoing throughout the summer to find much-needed resource, but this has proved unsuccessful.

Angling Trust CEO, Jamie Cook, added: “Steve and his team will be carrying out full review of this and other major events run this year, will be working with managers, captains and volunteers to understand where improvements need to be made and they will have my full support in this review and implementing the necessary changes as we rebuild the team.”

My thanks go out to the support we have received from our hard-working volunteers, match organisers and stewards – without you we couldn’t run events at all – but we need more help. If you have spare time, the right skills and knowledge, and want to help shape our events then please get in touch directly with myself – steve.fitzpatrick@anglingtrust.net

On behalf of the Angling Trust and Competitions team, my apologies to the teams and anglers impacted by the mistakes that were made.

We will be defined by how we improve next year and my promise to you is that we will run events which we are proud of and deliver a positive experience to everyone who fishes.



Steve Fitzpatrick, Head of Competitions, Angling Trust

The post Angling Trust Division 2 National – statement and apology from Steve Fitzpatrick, Head of Competitions appeared first on Angling Trust.

Continue reading...
 

mike fox

'Just Me and the Fish'
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 5, 2011
Messages
2,756
All these feable excuses don't wash with me. Prevention is better than cure. Professionalism is what's required and not all this amateurish incompetence.
 

Ade1

Active member
Site Supporter
Joined
Mar 6, 2018
Messages
63
From a mate who knows quite a few of the anglers involved, initially Sensas Manor Angling won by half a point, then someone pointed out that there are no half points in Nationals and as such Manor won by 2 points. Then it was established that an angler from Stroud was credited to the wrong team, the recount meant that Stroud were the winners.
 

rudd

Serial Blanker
Site Supporter
Joined
Jan 19, 2013
Messages
10,258
Load of tripe. Any software or process always has standard operating procedures which include backups/fallback procedures.
 

Geoff P

The MOGerator
Staff member
Site Supporter
Joined
Dec 2, 2001
Messages
16,962
The words "pee up" and "Brewery" spring to mind!!!!
 

pies

Regular member
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 27, 2003
Messages
2,009
To err is human, to make a complete flip up requires a computer
 

gingert76

Cebu, Philippines
Joined
Dec 3, 2002
Messages
4,867
if you use humans errors will be made, simple as that! doesnt mean its right or wrong, just means it can happen.

would strongly urge them to automate everything or as much as they can as the only way to remove errors is to remove the human elements.

as he said the process is not fully automated which means that the data input is human which is where you will get issues, if any stage of the process is not automated, including the input of the initial data, then you can get errors, you can have all the automation and orchestration you want but if the first step is wrong then it will all be wrong
 

Anglingman

Mr Ginster
Site Supporter
Joined
Jan 27, 2007
Messages
4,485
the list of errors around this event are frankly embarrassing from our governing body......
 

mike fox

'Just Me and the Fish'
Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 5, 2011
Messages
2,756
would strongly urge them to automate everything or as much as they can as the only way to remove errors is to remove the human elements.
Unfortunately it takes humans to press the computer buttons. I'm not certain that many humans in the AT are capable of pressing computer buttons in the correct order.
 

gingert76

Cebu, Philippines
Joined
Dec 3, 2002
Messages
4,867
it doesnt mike, you can easily automate that as well with tags and other options.

Thats my point really, i cant see them getting enough value out of a significant investment to remove all the humans / data entry. so this will always be a possibility, i think the best they can do is have a good / robust contingency plan / process in place
 
Top